Extraordinary Plenary Hall of Collado Villalba April 13 , 2007 the works (first part)
Item 1 of the Agenda: Extension of 5 months within the works.
D. Joseph A. Gómez Sierra (PSOE), considers that there (...) new scope requirements by the council and has been weather conditions without being determinants have had their impact [falsely false, no rain above the average for this time of year] , which is proposed by extending the deadline . D. Alberto Sánchez (ADEI) Sierra Gómez asked the Information Commission if he slept well and he said yes. He admires not turn red. Is tremendous as it comes back here to lie . (...) Reiterates that is tremendous as come here to lie, has the full minutes of December 15, 2005, which examines some arguments and you already knew that there would be an increase in work, you said that the trees would be a complementary project on the recovery of the mass of trees, and trees Battle of Bailen had no particular value, and before approving a work and knew that I needed. For you no value Trees Battle of Bailen, today it has value, 4 million euros, is tremendous . You talk about fixing Villaljosa Park, but this park was perfect, were the works that have broken, why we have to pay us . (...) Have applied for credit we had saved over 20 million . With the final formula Aracil 49,420,000 going off. [here not yet know the 13 million post]
D. Thomas Alberich (IU), (...) On the score, what was said and suspicions raised in the award, confirmed . For the reduction of time 125 points were awarded to Ortiz-Cover . Commissioning as well as down and in 12 months everything was running made being given 100 points, the other 12, 26, etc . This has not been met by way of the facts. Until now it was speculation, now brings them to be allowed 5 months. have not met the deadline and other aspects of the statement have not met the alternate work schedule, to allow movement of vehicles and people, this gave them 50 points and the other, 5 . awarded to the most expensive in conditions that have not been met . (...) We chose the worst place collapsing the center of the city. None of this is explained, it has awarded the company that was to be awarded. [not on record, but here there was talk of "suspicions" of "cronyism" and "favoritism"]
Ms. Carmen Rodriguez (PP), we believe that today's debate is called elections. You all reports of work, the work was perfect never had been any problem, was impeccable , also spoke of Ortiz, who had dismantled the Windsor. (...) We have a shocking amount of property they are wasting to do the work. This is a hoax, you know, but are forced to adopt it, that is the issue.
D. Joseph A. Gómez Sierra (PSOE), (...) On the run, how to execute the project has not been as drafted, did not fit geotechnical studies facts. (...) With the geotechnical study has been a project, it opens the soil and is not as planned. (...) It refers to a slide with the intervention of firefighters itself [sic] anything, it seems everyone knew how to execute the work under him, way he sleeps like a holy man . [here is where recognized snoring at night, with the peace of duty done, we assume] (...) the report of the technical department of the work claims that the causes are not attributable to the contractor and reported favorably extension.
D. Alberto Sánchez (ADEI), on the issue of term you Mr. Sierra is responsible, you have been saying that his advisers are the best, and then acknowledged that the project is worth, is a bad project, but we keep the same companies for which we continue to counsel. Talk about the weather, the geotechnical [sic] , truth is that this company is given 125 points to be delivered in February Battle of Bailen, why is not completed and turned in the street? , what has to do with Honorio Lozano?. Perhaps not aware of what they are doing, Where are the penalties? you are responsible, we have awarded to a company who does not, for 40 years and now we give a period of 5 months , vote against it.
D. Thomas Alberich (UI), not to recognize and assume to manipulate award is a scandal how has done. That would take political responsibility not want to take, no penalties have been imposed , remember that both are valued aspect of the alternative movement. You said Information Commission which is a project until it begins to open is not known. not been met at all, and nothing happens. This company is given the highest technical score, but then not required to comply, we reiterate that this is a project does not meet anything and nothing happens . When the other companies did not venture down time or other conditions, some might say now.
Ms. Carmen Rodriguez (PP), (...) is not credible that a joint venture we ask for an increase of 40% within , how can a business is willing to ask for 12 months and now 40% more?, That is so trick that no one believes it . Neither of them believe me, there is no possible justification, you choose to project, place, company, run because they were interested, he said yes, now all that is going to hell, hopefully ending in 5 months in this mess that have gotten us, vote against it. Mayor
(...) The project was put out to tender and award made before the two meetings with opposition groups. Everyone said IU less than the best project was to Tecnia, won both the draft and admitted allegations of political groups.
D. Alberto Sánchez (ADEI), that is not true .
Mayor calls for respect. That was done and discussed the issue of trees and improvements to the project. Comes to Honorio Lozano and there a number of problems with the structure of the rock, you have to authorize an increase in time for the completion of the works . [Is in this speech when, alteradísimo, the Mayor said that "all the works are delayed," which is not on record]
---
Previous chapters:
- Full Municipal Collado Villalba (I)
- Full Municipal Collado Villalba (II)
- Full Municipal Collado Villalba (III)
- Full Municipal Collado Villalba (IV)
- Full Municipal Collado Villalba (V)
- Full Municipal Collado Villalba (VI)
--- Full Council 
0 comments:
Post a Comment